From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:32:52 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] sam-ba: add license information In-Reply-To: <1366010340-10833-1-git-send-email-spdawson@gmail.com> References: <1366010340-10833-1-git-send-email-spdawson@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20130415103252.26d79960@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Simon, On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:19:00 +0100, spdawson at gmail.com wrote: > +SAM_BA_LICENSE = BSD-like > +SAM_BA_LICENSE_FILES = doc/readme.txt Hum, is this really the case? I thought the source code for it was not available? Well, it's true that a binary-only program can carry a BSD license... but to me, having 'BSD-like' license on a binary-only program sounds a bit odd. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com