Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Design issue with the out-of-tree support
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 14:53:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130523145354.40106277@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519E0EEC.6070402@carallon.com>

Dear Will Wagner,

On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:43:24 +0100, Will Wagner wrote:

> > Do you see solutions to this?
> 
> Thomas, I might be missing something but it seems like all the needed 
> dependencies are host dependencies. Can we not make all host 
> dependencies be on the patch step and all others on the configure step. 
> I think that would work for rtai wouldn't it?

Wow, thanks for taking the time to look into the problem, and enter the
discussion!

It seems like what you're proposing would work. It is not worst than the
solution of filtering out linux on one side, and including linux on the
other side that I was proposing, but I still don't find this very clean.

While it solves the problem, the solution seems completely disconnected
from it. In a few years: "Why the heck do we have host dependencies
before patch, and other dependencies before configure, instead of
having all of them together before patch? Ah, yes, because there is
this crazy specific need for RTAI".

So certainly, what you're proposing solves the problem, it just doesn't
really feel like a nice and clean solution. I know it's a very
subjective opinion I'm giving here, so if others do agree with that
proposal, I'll be fine with it, but I'd be interested in hearing the
ideas and opinions of others to see if we can come up with something
cleaner.

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-23 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-23 11:12 [Buildroot] Design issue with the out-of-tree support Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-23 12:43 ` Will Wagner
2013-05-23 12:53   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-05-23 14:49     ` Markos Chandras
2013-05-23 18:12 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-05-27 16:50 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-27 19:12   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-27 19:44     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-27 19:53       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-28 19:26         ` Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130523145354.40106277@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox