From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] arch: define appropriate ld emulation values for the MIPS architecture
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:57:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130606105730.3682f59e@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG2jQ8hOtBgc9ULF0KxmWrem60zRBqO8CKGFVEsL_02QsK6iZg@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Markos Chandras,
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:37:41 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> binutils set el32{l,b}smipn32 as default ABI for MIPS64 as well. The
> elf64{l,b}tsmip one need to be used only if you want to use the n64
> ABI. My opinion is that this patch needs to be changed to something
> like this:
>
> +config BR2_LD_TARGET_EMULATION
> + default "elf64ltsmip" if BR2_mips64el && BR2_MIPS_NABI64
> + default "elf64btsmip" if BR2_mips64 && BR2_MIPS_NABI64
> + default "elf32ltsmip" if BR2_mipsel && !BR2_MIPS_NABI32
> + default "elf32btsmip" if BR2_mips && !BR2_MIPS_NABI32
> + default "elf32ltsmipn32" if BR2_mipsel && BR2_MIPS_NABI32
> + default "elf32btsmipn32" if BR2_mips && BR2_MIPS_NABI32
Ok, but I'm not too happy with the fact that the BR2_mips64[el]
&& !BR2_MIPS_NABI64 is not being handled here. And according to
arch/Config.in.mips, in fact the n32 ABI does not make sense on 32 bits
BR2_mips and BR2_mipsel.
So, shouldn't this thing be:
config BR2_LD_TARGET_EMULATION
default "elf64ltsmip" if BR2_mips64el && BR2_MIPS_NABI64
default "elf64btsmip" if BR2_mips64 && BR2_MIPS_NABI64
default "elf32ltsmipn32" if BR2_mips64el && BR2_MIPS_NABI32
default "elf32btsmipn32" if BR2_mips64 && BR2_MIPS_NABI32
default "elf32ltsmip" if (BR2_mips64el && BR2_MIPS_OABI32) || BR2_mipsel
default "elf32btsmip" if (BR2_mips64 && BR2_MIPS_OABI32) || BR2_mips
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-06 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-05 21:59 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] toolchain: wrap 'ld' so that a ld emulation can be specified Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-05 21:59 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] arch: define appropriate ld emulation values for the MIPS architecture Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-06 8:37 ` Markos Chandras
2013-06-06 8:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-06-06 9:04 ` Markos Chandras
2013-06-06 8:31 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] toolchain: wrap 'ld' so that a ld emulation can be specified Markos Chandras
2013-06-06 8:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-06 8:56 ` Markos Chandras
2013-06-06 9:13 ` Markos Chandras
2013-06-06 10:04 ` Markos Chandras
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-20 9:33 Jan Heylen
2016-02-20 9:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] arch: define appropriate ld emulation values for the MIPS architecture Jan Heylen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130606105730.3682f59e@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox