From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 21:37:18 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] infra: make possible to run 'make *-menuconfig' from a clean output dir In-Reply-To: <1373222625-9013-1-git-send-email-s.martin49@gmail.com> References: <1373222625-9013-1-git-send-email-s.martin49@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20130707213718.516e580a@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Samuel Martin, On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 20:43:43 +0200, Samuel Martin wrote: > ifeq ($(BR2_CCACHE),y) > -BASE_TARGETS += host-ccache > +BASE_PKGS += host-ccache > endif > > ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT),y) > @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ include fs/common.mk > TARGETS+=target-post-image > > TARGETS_CLEAN:=$(patsubst %,%-clean,$(TARGETS)) > -TARGETS_SOURCE:=$(patsubst %,%-source,$(TARGETS) $(BASE_TARGETS)) > +TARGETS_SOURCE:=$(patsubst %,%-source,$(TARGETS) $(BASE_TARGETS) $(BASE_PKGS)) > TARGETS_DIRCLEAN:=$(patsubst %,%-dirclean,$(TARGETS)) > TARGETS_ALL:=$(patsubst %,__real_tgt_%,$(TARGETS)) > > @@ -397,6 +397,8 @@ $(BASE_TARGETS): dirs $(HOST_DIR)/usr/share/buildroot/toolchainfile.cmake > $(BUILD_DIR)/buildroot-config/auto.conf: $(BUILDROOT_CONFIG) > $(MAKE) $(EXTRAMAKEARGS) HOSTCC="$(HOSTCC_NOCCACHE)" HOSTCXX="$(HOSTCXX_NOCCACHE)" silentoldconfig > > +BASE_TARGETS += $(BASE_PKGS) > + Is this really the correct fix? Currently BASE_TARGETS contains host-ccache if enabled, and the toolchain- target. So, normally, all packages should depend on both, and there should be no need to introduce a separate $(BASE_PKGS). > prepare: $(BUILD_DIR)/buildroot-config/auto.conf > > toolchain: prepare dirs dependencies $(BASE_TARGETS) > diff --git a/package/pkg-generic.mk b/package/pkg-generic.mk > index 668f011..282ce99 100644 > --- a/package/pkg-generic.mk > +++ b/package/pkg-generic.mk > @@ -303,6 +303,9 @@ $(2)_REDISTRIBUTE ?= YES > > > $(2)_DEPENDENCIES ?= $(filter-out $(1),$(patsubst host-host-%,host-%,$(addprefix host-,$($(3)_DEPENDENCIES)))) > +ifeq ($(filter $(1),$(BASE_PKGS)),) > +$(2)_DEPENDENCIES += $(BASE_PKGS) > +endif I.e, wouldn't $(2)_DEPENDENCIES += $(BASE_TARGETS) work? Hum, the issue would of course be a recursive dependency on the Crosstool-NG package, because toolchain-crosstool-ng depends on crosstool-ng, and crosstool-ng being a package, it would in turn depend on toolchain-crosstool-ng. Ditto for some other packages like gcc-{initial,intermediate,final}, binutils and so on. So maybe what I'm proposing in fact doesn't work, unless such packages are identified specifically, like _TOOLCHAIN_COMPONENT = YES, which would prevent $(BASE_TARGETS) from being added to the dependencies of such packages. Hum, now that I think of it, technically speaking, only the target packages do need to have the dependency on the toolchain, host packages do not. But both need the dependency on host-ccache. Ok, the problem is complex, but I would really prefer to see a global reflexion on how to name all those BASE_TARGETS, BASE_PKGS, TARGETS variables rather than adding yet another hack into this mess. Note that I am also currently fiddling in this area, since I have issues getting 'make source' and 'make external-deps' to work properly since the conversion of the internal backend to packages. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com