From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:45:23 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 2/2] qt: add powervr and opengl In-Reply-To: <51DE77FE.2060709@carallon.com> References: <1373479838-8288-1-git-send-email-spenser@gillilanding.com> <51DDAF1A.5040602@carallon.com> <20130711104744.7fa84966@skate> <51DE77FE.2060709@carallon.com> Message-ID: <20130711114523.1384e3c6@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Will Wagner, On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:16:46 +0100, Will Wagner wrote: > Ok, makes sense that the virtual package is only needed if we have more > than one package that offers it. I already have two hardware packages > that offer powervr support which is why I did it that way and it sounds > like Spenser is planning to add another as well. Okay, I wasn't really aware there was today another PowerVR implementation. Is it fully API-compatible with the PowerVR stuff of the ti-gfx package currently done by Spenser? What is this other PowerVR thing for compared to the one currently packaged by Spenser? Is the 'ti-gfx' package name chosen by Spenser appropriate? > Just to be difficult I'll also point out that currently in buildroot > there is only one package (rpi_userland) that offers opengl_es and > opengl_egl support so you were obviously planning for the future when > you made those a virtual package :) That's true :) Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com