From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 19:14:41 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 2/3] ti-gfx: add new package In-Reply-To: References: <1373639678-7357-1-git-send-email-spenser@gillilanding.com> <1373639678-7357-2-git-send-email-spenser@gillilanding.com> <20130713161147.7ef19265@skate> Message-ID: <20130713191441.17ffdb9e@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Spenser Gilliland, On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:08:45 -0500, Spenser Gilliland wrote: > > No, if you have introduced the powervr virtual package, then libegl > > should not directly depend on ti-gfx, but instead libegl should depend > > on powervr, which itself will depend on ti-gfx. > > I don't believe this to be correct. There is not specific dependency > chain as each powervr package implements its own set of egl/gles/vg. > The point of the PowerVR package is for each package that takes > advantage of PowerVR specific features. IE. QT4. > > Therefore, ti-gfx should depend on libgles, libegl,and powervr. I guess you mean "should provide" and not "should depend". But ok, as discussed on IRC, I see what you mean. We consider libegl, libgles2 and powervr to be separate virtual features, and it happens that ti-gfx provides all of them. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com