From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 10:03:03 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] AVR32 toolchain build failure
In-Reply-To: <CAHt8ZCOx1o1GPcgFZN9RYQWvGivTy5R6bWuUwX4B67qban++EA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAXf6LUhgOkHgj=cRWnkR8tPhAAjT6BhXFvXTBvC5pHfTZ=vww@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130806195402.2f3f94e7@skate>
 <CAAXf6LU0oihr6qLh4KA=+fKYWEbk-iOpwvsmo7AWPSjyC7_=KA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAXf6LWF=7-cP_=mTRjNK1qki-gxKx+BoR1C_1Bw9QGUUtstmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130807172033.564940d1@skate>
 <CAAXf6LVT144yhgAh5ce5O9FjR=osQ=qV=sod=-pDSOiqeRTvuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAXf6LVFECrtPWQsw0HU5H+ZHjU0tYmz5SNgeKsBA_0RzkNJsQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130808000726.66ab7194@skate>
 <CAAXf6LUvZEOeF8dDrESqYKr3iiT3haQFzrH-=VnH7gDcvd+z-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHt8ZCOx1o1GPcgFZN9RYQWvGivTy5R6bWuUwX4B67qban++EA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130808100303.2b0226dd@skate>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Dear Simon Dawson,

On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 08:21:14 +0100, Simon Dawson wrote:

> From my point of view, the ideal solution would be to reinstate uClibc
> 0.9.31 support, and to lock the avr32 toolchain to that version of
> uClibc. But I understand that this is likely to be unacceptable to
> others.

Gustavo, you're the one who removed uClibc 0.9.31. What would it take
to reinstate it? Have we made some significant simplifications/cleanups
that would be complicated to rework to bring back 0.9.31 support for
AVR32 ?

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com