From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:20:04 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] usbip: new package In-Reply-To: References: <20121226070612.GC7402@sapphire.tkos.co.il> <20121226094937.3c2b9383@skate> Message-ID: <20130813232004.5aca237c@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Marcin Bis, On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:55:47 +0100, Marcin Bis wrote: > Signed-off-by: Marcin Bis > --- > package/Config.in | 1 + > package/usbip/Config.in | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > package/usbip/usbip.mk | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Are you still interested in getting usbip packaged in Buildroot? If so, could you rework your patch to use instead the code bundled with the kernel in drivers/staging/usbip/userspace, as suggested by Baruch? The package/perf package provides an example on how to create a package for a tool whose source code is shipped directly within the kernel sources. Since those comments have been made in December 2012, without further postings from you, I'm marking the patch as "Changes requested" in patchwork. This means that unless you post an updated version at some point in the future, we'll no longer have 'usbip' in the list of patches to integrate. Thanks for your contribution! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com