From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC] uclibc: reinstate support for version 0.9.31
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:02:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130827100209.4759e82f@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHt8ZCN7zEKhx3znac2=1Nha2z1Gi6vK9MrihVC2Dc=80OU_Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Simon Dawson,
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:41:16 +0100, Simon Dawson wrote:
> On 26 August 2013 15:32, Thomas Petazzoni
> <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > You said:
> >
> > ""unfortunately,
> > while uClibc 0.9.33.x does build for avr32, the result is a root
> > filesystem with unusably-slow runtime performance.
> > ""
> >
> > Then maybe we should make 0.9.31 the only possible uClibc version for
> > AVR32 ?
>
> Yes, I think that would be a good idea. Should that be done in a separate patch?
Probably yes, but it's not a strong opinion.
> >> diff --git a/package/connman/Config.in b/package/connman/Config.in
> >> index 0853941..22f3b9f 100644
> >> --- a/package/connman/Config.in
> >> +++ b/package/connman/Config.in
> >> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_CONNMAN
> >> select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGLIB2
> >> select BR2_PACKAGE_IPTABLES
> >> select BR2_PACKAGE_GNUTLS
> >> - depends on !BR2_UCLIBC_VERSION_0_9_32
> >> + depends on !(BR2_UCLIBC_VERSION_0_9_31 || BR2_UCLIBC_VERSION_0_9_32)
> >
> > Maybe it was inotify that was missing, but I see you've backported the
> > inotify support in 0.9.31. Or it was something else than inotify?
>
> I don't quite follow your meaning here... Are you referring to the
> connman package specifically?
Yes, I was referring to the connman package specifically.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-27 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-20 11:14 [Buildroot] [RFC] uclibc: reinstate support for version 0.9.31 spdawson at gmail.com
2013-08-26 14:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-27 7:41 ` Simon Dawson
2013-08-27 8:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-08-27 8:16 ` Simon Dawson
2013-08-27 8:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130827100209.4759e82f@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox