Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] libdrm: bump and add experimental ARM framebuffer support
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 22:42:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130827224205.4017fa17@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEBucnBL47PkMSgQhq+jT6QbE_rOqk3LzMPBcomK4j6yh5h3-Q@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Spenser Gilliland,

On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:24:08 -0500, Spenser Gilliland wrote:

> > libatomic_ops is not available on all architectures. In the prevous
> > libdrm code, it was only selected on i386 and x86-64, so it was ok, but
> > if libatomic_ops is now needed in all cases for libdrm, then you need
> > to propagate the libatomic_ops dependencies into libdrm, i.e:
> >
> >         depends on BR2_arm || BR2_armeb || BR2_i386 || BR2_sparc || BR2_powerpc || BR2_x86_64
> 
> It is only needed for x86/x86_64, so we can select the option only
> when BR2_i386 or BR2_x86_64.

Fine.

> >> +     select BR2_PACKAGE_XLIB_LIBPCIACCESS if BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64
> >>       depends on BR2_PACKAGE_XORG7
> >
> > If libdrm is needed by Wayland, then it sounds strange to require
> > enabling BR2_PACKAGE_XORG7. When I did the Wayland packaging, there are
> > a few X.org packages that I moved out of the BR2_PACKAGE_XORG7
> > condition, maybe we should do the same for libpciaccess and
> > libpthread-stubs. But ok, this is probably something we can tackle at a
> > later point, I don't want to require you to solve all problems right
> > now :)
> 
> I agree these packages should probably be moved out of xorg, but the
> BR2_PACKAGE_XORG7 doesn't really do much other than allow access to
> the libraries.

That's true, but it means that the user needs to know that the global
BR2_PACKAGE_XORG7 option has to be enabled if he wants to build
something completely unrelated (say Wayland).

But ok, as I said, let's do this later on.

> >> -ifneq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_XDRIVER_XF86_VIDEO_ATI),y)
> >> -LIBDRM_CONF_OPT += --disable-radeon
> >
> > So those --enable-intel / --disable-radeon things are no longer needed?
> 
> I'll do some more testing to make sure but I don't believe so.

Ok.

> >> +ifeq ($(BR2_arm),y)
> >> +LIBDRM_CONF_OPT += \
> >> +     --enable-omap-experimental-api \
> >> +     --enable-exynos-experimental-api \
> >> +     --enable-freedreno-experimental-api
> >>  endif
> >
> > It seems strange to me to enable those options as soon as we're on ARM.
> > I think we probably need Config.in sub-options for these.
> 
> I'll add config options for each driver.  I initially tried to avoid
> this, but more and more I think it's a better solution.

Excellent, thanks.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-27 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-24 19:41 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/6] Sunxi fixes, improve Mesa3d Support, and add glmark2 benchmark application Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-24 19:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] libdrm: bump and add experimental ARM framebuffer support Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-26 17:33   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-08-27  7:38   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-27 19:24     ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-27 20:42       ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-08-24 19:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/6] sunxi-mali: bug fixes for pc and init script Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-27  7:39   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 11:44   ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-08-24 19:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/6] sunxi-cedarx: bump to newer version, use armel2 binaries, add demo Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-24 19:41 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/6] mesa3d: reorganize, modularize, and bump to version 9.1.6 Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-25  6:45   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-08-26 17:27   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-08-27 18:56     ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-24 19:42 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/6] libpng12: new package Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-26 17:21   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-08-27 18:58     ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-24 19:42 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/6] glmark2: " Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-26 17:43   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-08-27 19:01     ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-29  5:35       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-08-29 18:24         ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-08-27 20:48   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-06 16:35     ` Spenser Gilliland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130827224205.4017fa17@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox