From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:01:43 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [pull request] webkit: Version bump to 1.11.5 In-Reply-To: References: <5227648E.7030304@mind.be> <20130905100121.4546cd3d@skate> Message-ID: <20130905110143.55467e66@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Markos Chandras, On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 09:48:32 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: > > A 1490 line patch is not so huge, I believe it should make it on the > > list, and if not, Peter will validate it manually. I agree that the > > overall patch should be sent to the list for review. > > Well, it's an upstream patch, so i don't think there is much to review > there but I can send it to the list anyway. It's not much to review this upstream patch, but rather the overall changes in webkit.mk and so on. > >> Is there a reason why you cannot download the upstream patches with > >> WEBKIT_PATCH ? > > > > When it's possible, it's indeed a good idea. > > Unfortunately, I can't (or I don't think I can) use that. I had to > tweak the upstream patches a bit, > for example delete the changes in the ChangeLog files since they don't apply. > For other patches, I had to merge 2-3 upstream patches into a single > one in order to fix the problem completely instead of providing > separate patches with 1-2 line fixes. Ok. Since the patches are upstream, that's fine, since it means they will be removed at some point in the future. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com