From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 08:28:27 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 01/17] libsepol: new package In-Reply-To: <5228B55E.2090505@mind.be> References: <1378336196-27403-1-git-send-email-clshotwe@rockwellcollins.com> <1378336196-27403-2-git-send-email-clshotwe@rockwellcollins.com> <20130905094446.3f139253@skate> <5228B55E.2090505@mind.be> Message-ID: <20130906082827.5b05c498@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Arnout Vandecappelle, On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 18:46:22 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > I don't think it's really necessary to do this move just because it > looks nicer. I think it's better to stay with upstream. Although this > would be the first package to install anything in $(HOST_DIR)/lib, we > anyway already have > > HOST_LDFLAGS += -L$(HOST_DIR)/lib ... > > We don't have an rpath for it, though, so maybe that should be added. Yes, that's the other option. I don't have a strong feeling about this. At some point, I was thinking of proposing to remove $(HOST_DIR)/usr and have everything under $(HOST_DIR)/ directly. The advantage is that the binaries of the toolchain would be directly under $(HOST_DIR)/bin, which would mean creating a tarball of $(HOST_DIR) would create a toolchain that is more similar to other cross-compilation toolchains you can find around (Linaro, CodeSourcery, etc.). Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com