From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 13:49:09 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Two or three stages gcc build? In-Reply-To: References: <20130705233831.12030038@skate> <9C6FE6D2-322A-41E7-8B82-C623B5C1F754@gmail.com> <20130906145821.4ce0ab13@skate> <20130907111552.0d646140@skate> Message-ID: <20130907134909.1619d80c@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Martin Guy, On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 13:45:45 +0200, Martin Guy wrote: > On 07/09/2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > We do need to support building gcc 4.2.x, because that's the only > > version for which thee AVR32 architecture is supported. > > A few months ago I incorporated and improved the new AVR32 support > for gcc 4.3 and 4.4. Since AVR's dirty patches also affect code > generation on other non-AVR32 processors, I chose to do the > development outside the main branch but the results, a fork of ct-ng, > are visible at https://spaces.atmel.com/gf/project/ct-ng/ Yes, I have seen that (maybe you announced it already on the ct-ng mailing list). I personally don't care enough about AVR32 to spend some time integrating this in Buildroot, but I've Cc'ed Simon Dawson who might be interested. That said, even gcc 4.4 is relatively "old" by these days standards, so I am not sure it would make a huge difference compared to keeping the existing gcc 4.2. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com