From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 20:55:14 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/5] qt5: bump to 5.1.1 In-Reply-To: <523B3759.1000901@mind.be> References: <201309182118.23091.fatih.asici@gmail.com> <20130919062450.10f51848@skate> <1379568660.27759.4.camel@viko> <523B3759.1000901@mind.be> Message-ID: <20130919205514.53b092ff@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Arnout Vandecappelle, On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:41:45 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > Perhaps we could try upstreaming our mkspecs? Does that make sense? Our mkspecs is really meant to be a template that has to be tuned by the qt5base.mk makefile, and therefore outside Buildroot itself I believe its meaning is not so important. We could even carry it within package/qt5/qt5base/ rather than as a patch, for example. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com