From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 09:41:22 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2013-09-19 In-Reply-To: <87hadebvkm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <20130920063008.7C55952C101@lolut.humanoidz.org> <20130921054145.52b70d5e@skate> <87hadebvkm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20130921094122.4c9d4552@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Peter Korsgaard, On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 07:19:37 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Thomas> Hum, apparently on ARC, building libgcc requires having the C library > Thomas> headers. So, due to the change to build gcc in two passes instead of > Thomas> three, we're building libgcc in the first pass, before the C library is > Thomas> built, causing (I believe) the above failure. Mischa, if you have any > Thomas> insights about this, I'm interested :) > > Thomas> Considering this problem, and the other SSP problems, I'm starting to > Thomas> wonder if my patch that changes the toolchain build mechanism to use > Thomas> two passes instead of three shouldn't be reverted for now, until I find > Thomas> the time to investigate all the problems that it is causing. > > I'm thinking the same. Will you have time to work on it in the next week > or so? Otherwise I think we should revert for now. No, I will not have the time in the next week, that's also why I was suggesting to revert it for now. Let's see the good side of the thing: I'm now aware of a few problematic cases that I should test before submitting the next version. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com