From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:13:58 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] Openpowerlink: new package In-Reply-To: References: <1165322922.7308619.1379724109699.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr> <681556336.7308664.1379724486354.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr> <20130922154358.6351078a@skate> Message-ID: <20130923141358.25086aa1@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Thomas De Schampheleire, On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:34:55 +0200, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote: > After your initial mail I tried K9, but those darn bastards also wrap > at 72 lines! Luckily, K9 is open-source, and I found the offending > code quite easily and filed a bug report here: > http://code.google.com/p/k9mail/issues/detail?id=5957 > In the mean time, I'll try to compile it myself, haven't done any > Android development before. Nice! This is getting out-of-topic, but personally, I like the wrap or to not wrap question to be decided on a per e-mail basis. When I need to reply to a patch, I don't want the original e-mail to be wrapped. However, when I reply to a normal e-mail that has been sent with Outlook or some other crappy mail client that does not wrap at all, then I generally like wrapping such e-mails to have a nice formatting when replying. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com