From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 17:12:47 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Fix compilation of systemd with uclibc In-Reply-To: <87wqlvpvgh.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <1380627492-25380-1-git-send-email-jezz@sysmic.org> <20131001144009.4117ea4c@skate> <87wqlvpvgh.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20131002171247.0cadeb06@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Peter Korsgaard, On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:02:22 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Thomas> The thing that worries me is that we start to rely on uClibc > Thomas> features that are provided by specific patches we have added to > Thomas> our uClibc package. This means that an user using an uClibc > Thomas> toolchain provided by Analog Devices for Blackfin, or built > Thomas> with Crosstool-NG will no longer work properly to build those > Thomas> packages. > > As uClibc is configurable, this can never be 100% safe, but I agree we > should try to keep these things to a minimum. Right, but making the assumption that uClibc provides a feature that isn't available in the latest uClibc release doesn't seem like a reasonable compromise in terms of external uClibc toolchain support. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com