From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] manual: update review process and patchwork
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:49:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008234943.688148ea@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381266205-29322-1-git-send-email-rjbarnet@rockwellcollins.com>
Dear Ryan Barnett,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:03:25 -0500, Ryan Barnett wrote:
> Adding more documentaiton based on discussion from the mailing list
> in regards the buildroot review process and how patchworks can be
> used to pull in patches for testing purposes.
>
> Mailing list discussion:
> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2013-September/078170.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Barnett <rjbarnet@rockwellcollins.com>
Thanks, looks good! A few comments below.
> +The patchworks website can be used to pull in patches for testing
> +purposes. Please see xref:apply-patches-patchwork[] for more
> +information on using the patchworks website to apply patches.
It's actually "patchwork", not "patchworks", as far as I can see.
> -The Buildroot patch management interface is at
> +Patchwork is a web-based patch tracking system designed to facilitate
> +the contribution and management of contributions to an open-source
> +project. Patches that have been sent to a mailing list are \'caught' by
> +the system, and appear on a web page. Any comments posted that
> +reference the patch are appended to the patch page too. For more
> +information on Patchwork see
> +http://jk.ozlabs.org/projects/patchwork[].
> +
> +Buildroot utilizes this tool to ensure patches aren't missed
> +along with exposing all patches and their corresponding review comments
> +in a clean web interface.
This looks good, but I would probably emphasize the fact that patchwork
is mainly a tool for the maintainers and core contributors. Newcomers
don't have to worry about patchwork. I believe this was the original
misunderstanding that you had, thinking that you had to somehow
interact with patchwork to get your patches reviewed or accepted, which
is not the case.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-08 21:03 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] manual: update review process and patchwork Ryan Barnett
2013-10-08 21:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-10-08 23:56 ` Ryan Barnett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131008234943.688148ea@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox