From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:31:32 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCHv3 04/20] toolchain: introduce a virtual package In-Reply-To: References: <1381256237-27948-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1381256237-27948-5-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20131009110251.64401cb3@skate> Message-ID: <20131009153132.4da6f79b@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Fabio Porcedda, On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:59:07 +0200, Fabio Porcedda wrote: > > BASE_TARGETS = toolchain, so there are exactly equivalent. I'm not sure > > why you say BASE_TARGETS is an implementation detail of the new > > toolchain virtual package. BASE_TARGETS now never has any other value > > than just "toolchain". > > Sorry, I've missed that part, now I understand better. No problem :) > > Ultimately, toolchain will no longer need to be part of BASE_TARGETS as > > it will be handled just as a normal package dependency (done by your > > patches). But I'm trying to do things step by step, progressively. > > Therefore, in the end, I believe the world rule will no even contain > > "toolchain" and $(TARGETS_ALL) but just $(PACKAGES), > > Well about the world rule in my patches in the end it contain only the > "target-post-image" because it's the last step, but that's another > story. Yes, indeed. Seen your patches, I think they look good on principle, I need to test them/have a more detailed look. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com