From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] legal info: saving of external toolchain
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:04:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131010230458.78e1a857@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LXAP+nsmMm7fp0_xvzLNT8cAYof4DECUYhpSs1RzE3Zeg@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Thomas De Schampheleire,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:51:41 +0200, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> The legal info infrastructure currently does not do anything for the
> toolchain, for 'technical reasons'. I can't recall what these
> technical reasons where. At least for external toolchains I don't see
> a big problem to copy the toolchain also in the sources/ subdirectory.
> The developer then still has the obligation to also provide the
> sources that accompany this binary distribution of the toolchain
> (which is impossible for buildroot to do), but at least the binary
> version is already taken care of.
>
> In fact, the legal-info target already calls toolchain-legal-info, but
> it does not do anything really.
>
> What do you think about implementing this for external toolchains (at
> least)? The fact that the toolchain is now using the package
> infrastructure probably makes that a tad easier.
I do agree. The primary reason I turned the toolchain backends into
package was precisely to be able to leverage all the goodness of the
package infrastructure: source, external-deps and legal-info.
Note that you're only mentioning external toolchains, but it also
applies to the internal toolchain: verifying that we have proper
licensing information on mpfr, gmp, mpc, gcc, glibc, eglibc, uclibc,
binutils would be good.
For external toolchains it's a little bit more complicated, because the
tarballs are actually pre-compiled binaries. To comply with the
license, we would have to add a mechanism to also download the source
code of the external toolchain. For example, for the Sourcery CodeBench
ARM toolchain, the source is in
http://sourcery.mentor.com/public/gnu_toolchain/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/arm-2013.05-24-arm-none-linux-gnueabi.src.tar.bz2.
But we don't really have a good way of encoding that in Buildroot at
the moment, I'm afraid.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-10 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-10 14:51 [Buildroot] legal info: saving of external toolchain Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-10-10 20:37 ` Luca Ceresoli
2013-10-10 21:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131010230458.78e1a857@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox