From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:27:41 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Compile static versions of gcc libraries In-Reply-To: <2096076.neUu8LQVqN@sagittae> References: <1381398042-6925-1-git-send-email-jezz@sysmic.org> <20131013153355.3839117b@skate> <2096076.neUu8LQVqN@sagittae> Message-ID: <20131014112741.279b7c49@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear J?r?me Pouiller, On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:16:08 +0200, J?r?me Pouiller wrote: > On Sunday 13 October 2013 15:33:55 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Dear J?r?me Pouiller, > > > > On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:40:42 +0200, J?r?me Pouiller wrote: > > > Since default configure options for host packages include > > > --disable-static, gcc was not configured to build static version of > > > its libraries (libgcc.a, libstdc++.a, ...). > > > > I'm a bit confused, the toolchains I have here definitely do have > > libgcc.a : > > > > $ find . -name 'libgcc.a' > > ./host/usr/lib/gcc/sh4-buildroot-linux-uclibc/4.7.3/libgcc.a > > Sorry, in contrary of what I wrote in my commit message, this does not > impact libgcc.a. However, it impacts libstdc++.a, libgomp.a, > libmudflap*.a, ... > > > What practical issue are you seeing? > My main concern is libstdc++.a. Ah, ok. I'll retry then and see what happens :) Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com