From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:56:21 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] pkg-infra: introduce pre/post-step hooks In-Reply-To: References: <867c8550-360d-40e7-96d1-9391ed121afc@email.android.com> <20131029184331.GG3411@free.fr> Message-ID: <20131029205620.GH3411@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thomas DS, All, On 2013-10-29 21:03 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire spake thusly: > Hi Yann, Ryan, > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > On 2013-10-27 22:40 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire spake thusly: > > >> I personally find the name STEP_HOOKS pretty vague, if you don't know > >> the context you have no clue what it could be. The other hooks > >> POST_EXTRACT etc are clear from their name. > >> Maybe, GLOBAL_INSTRUMENTATION_HOOKS? > > > > I'm on the side of Ryan here: it is way too long. :-p > > I'll try to see if I can come with a better name, though. > > > > I'm fine with looking at other names, of course, but I don't see how > GLOBAL_INSTRUMENTATION_HOOKS > is longer than > FOO_POST_INSTALL_STAGING_HOOKS > FOO_POST_INSTALL_TARGET_HOOKS > or > CONNTRACK_TOOLS_PRE_CONFIGURE_HOOKS > > Besides, it's not that you're writing this so regularly that the > length is really so important, IMHO. Yeah, yeah, right. :-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'