From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:47:27 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] arch/mips: Set BR2_GCC_TARGET_ARCH for MIPS In-Reply-To: <52722E32.7050307@mind.be> References: <1382970069-16449-1-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com> <20131030184534.7bf2477b@skate> <20131031102253.1aeaea28@skate> <52722E32.7050307@mind.be> Message-ID: <20131031114727.681766bb@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Arnout Vandecappelle, On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:17:22 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > >> Could be a possibility indeed, but it means that I continue to see > >> these patches in patchwork. Admittedly with a different state, but it's > >> not as nice as not having them anymore. > > I would set it as Superseded, instead of Accepted. The assumption is > that you'll repost the series on the list, not send an empty pull > request, right? Then Superseded is actually the correct state, or > eventually it will be. No, I was not necessarily thinking of resending each patch to the list: all those patches have been on the list, and I've made little to no changes to them. I have also been careful to post my own patches on the list, and only afterwards apply them, so that all patches have been made visible to the list. Of course, if the general opinion is that I should resend all of the patches to the list, then I'm fine with doing that once Peter is back from vacations. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com