From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/7] gdb: arc: Use git instead of website
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:52:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131112225250.51c7459b@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E6BF041E97966E4DB955F0DF883AD2D685F1749A@de02wembxa.internal.synopsys.com>
Dear Mischa Jonker,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:40:12 +0000, Mischa Jonker wrote:
> > Is there any reason why for gdb and binutils we don't have a "choice"
> > option for the ARC version? I know it's a bit silly because for ARC that
> > would be the only choice, but that would make things more similar to what we
> > do for gcc, no?
>
> I think that was decided as part of the review process back then. To be honest, I forgot to remove the choice in gcc now, so I didn't use this opportunity to make it consistent. Now that I'll make a v2 anyway, please let me know what your preference is: to choose or not to choose.
The problem is that the gcc choice is helpful to be able to do the
"select BR2_GCC_NEEDS_MPC". If you remove the gcc version choice, you
would have to add a "select BR2_GCC_NEEDS_MPC if BR2_arc" under the
main gcc option. Not a big deal, but I'm wondering if I don't prefer
having a single choice option.
Let's hear what others have to say, I don't have a really strong
opinion on the matter, except that I'd like to have consistency between
gcc/binutils/uClibc on the matter, and also across architectures: ARC,
AVR32 and Microblaze (all needing special versions) should use the same
strategy. Of course, I'm not asking you to fix all of them, just want
to figure out a strategy that we will apply to all of these cases.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-12 13:26 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/7] RFC: Move to github as source for ARC-specific packages Mischa Jonker
2013-11-12 13:26 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/7] gdb: arc: Use git instead of website Mischa Jonker
2013-11-12 21:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-12 21:40 ` Mischa Jonker
2013-11-12 21:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-11-12 13:26 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/7] binutils: " Mischa Jonker
2013-11-12 13:26 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/7] gcc: arc: Download from github instead of Synopsys website Mischa Jonker
2013-11-12 13:26 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/7] uclibc: arc: Use git instead of website Mischa Jonker
2013-11-12 13:26 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/7] gcc: remove ARC-specific patches Mischa Jonker
2013-11-12 17:03 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-11-12 13:26 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/7] uclibc: " Mischa Jonker
2013-11-12 13:26 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 7/7] Revert "arc: Add option for ARC-specific download site" Mischa Jonker
2013-11-12 14:59 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/7] RFC: Move to github as source for ARC-specific packages Spenser Gilliland
2013-11-12 15:07 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131112225250.51c7459b@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox