From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:58:19 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 6/7] toolchain: uclibc does not support microblze In-Reply-To: <1384378130-8599-7-git-send-email-spenser@gillilanding.com> References: <1384378130-8599-1-git-send-email-spenser@gillilanding.com> <1384378130-8599-7-git-send-email-spenser@gillilanding.com> Message-ID: <20131113225819.56b10ada@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Spenser Gilliland, On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:28:49 -0600, Spenser Gilliland wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Spenser Gilliland > --- > toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > index 1529004..57bbc3d 100644 > --- a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ choice > config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_UCLIBC > bool "uClibc" > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC > + depends on !BR2_microblaze Hum, I see a libc/sysdeps/linux/microblaze in my uClibc tree. And also, since there are some no-MMU variant of Microblaze processors, which C library other than uClibc could they use? That being said, I don't *require* you to add the support for uClibc. Having glibc/eglibc support is already good. We can add uClibc support later on. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com