From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:20:35 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 6/7] toolchain: uclibc does not support microblze In-Reply-To: <1384382133.11719.5.camel@scotch.dyn.gillilanding.com> References: <1384378130-8599-1-git-send-email-spenser@gillilanding.com> <1384378130-8599-7-git-send-email-spenser@gillilanding.com> <20131113225819.56b10ada@skate> <1384382133.11719.5.camel@scotch.dyn.gillilanding.com> Message-ID: <20131114002035.68f41c38@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Spenser Gilliland, On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:35:33 -0600, Spenser Gilliland wrote: > > > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC > > > + depends on !BR2_microblaze > > > > Hum, I see a libc/sysdeps/linux/microblaze in my uClibc tree. And also, > > since there are some no-MMU variant of Microblaze processors, which C > > library other than uClibc could they use? > > In the distant past there may have been a version of uclibc that worked > with microblaze. However from my limited testing, the current toolchain > does not work with uclibc. Ok. But then which C library are Microblaze non-MMU users using? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com