From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:18:17 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [pkg-luarocks infra V3 01/10] luainterpreter: create virtual package In-Reply-To: References: <1384460249-32410-1-git-send-email-francois.perrad@gadz.org> <20131115094423.024e1af8@skate> Message-ID: <20131115101817.2c63a9ef@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Thomas De Schampheleire, On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:11:12 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote: > > On the other hand, we have: > > > > BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_OPENGL_EGL > > BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_OPENGL_ES > > BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_OPENVG > > BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_OPENMAX > > BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_POWERVR > > Hm, I wasn't aware of that. > These also sound awkward to me, BR2_HAS_OPENGL_EGL etc. seems more logical... > Changing this would of course mean new legacy options... I don't think so, because those options are hidden options, they are merely here to create a "disconnection" between providers of a feature (i.e an OpenGL implementation) and consumers of a feature (i.e applications or libraries using the OpenGL API). So I believe we can rename them as much as we want. > > for virtual packages. This way instead of showing "unknown" in the ">>> > > blabla unknown extracting" messages, we would have ">>> blabla virtual > > extracting". > > Sounds good to me. This could also be used for the external toolchain then... Of course, all virtual packages would have to be changed. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com