From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:59:20 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/5] coreutils: belongs to system tools, not development In-Reply-To: <87zjoipdlk.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <1385981368-2235-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <87zjoipdlk.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20131203095920.1e46375f@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Peter Korsgaard, On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 09:01:43 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo Zacarias writes: > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias > > --- > > package/Config.in | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > diff --git a/package/Config.in b/package/Config.in > > index e2ca8ee..a65ceac 100644 > > --- a/package/Config.in > > +++ b/package/Config.in > > @@ -86,9 +86,6 @@ source "package/bison/Config.in" > > source "package/bsdiff/Config.in" > > source "package/bustle/Config.in" > > source "package/ccache/Config.in" > > -if BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_SHOW_OTHERS > > -source "package/coreutils/Config.in" > > -endif > > Committed, thanks. > > I'm really starting to think we should get rid of > BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_SHOW_OTHERS, or atleast make it default y. > > Comments, anybody? We've always said that it was important to keep this option so that newcomers don't enable things like coreutils, bash and so on, and use what I'd consider the default "Buildroot experience", i.e Busybox. What made you change your mind about this? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com