From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:28:47 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [buildroot] libevas build failure analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20131204102847.5b91870e@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Arnaud, On Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:13:52 +0100, arnaud aujon wrote: > About adding a requirement to have a toolchain with thread support,is there > any chips/boards that can't have thread support in their toolchain ? Huh? Having thread support or not is not related to the underlying hardware (i.e SoC or board). It's a software choice, at the C library configuration level. So there is absolutely no problem in requiring thread support for something relatively large such as EFL. > And as you said, I guess have EFL 1.7 and 1.8 for some time is a good idea. Why? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com