From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] qemu-system: new host package
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 23:31:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131205233131.0cad979d@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A0BCBC.5000008@mind.be>
Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:49:48 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> >> Yes, I agree, the user mode emulation should probably be removed. It
> >> simply cannot work properly, because we have no way of guaranteeing
> >> that the kernel headers used for the target toolchain are older than
> >> the kernel running on the system.
>
> It's not possible to do it in Config.in, but it's easy to do during the
> build: compare /usr/include/linux/version.h with
> $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/linux/version.h
And then you fail the build if
$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/linux/version.h gives a newer version
of /usr/include/linux/version.h ? Could be possible, even if not really
nice. But Fran?ois is proposing to remove cpanminus, which was the only
reason to have qemu-user support. So do we care?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-05 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-04 0:40 [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] host-qemu-system Gustavo Zacarias
2013-12-04 0:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] qemu-system: new host package Gustavo Zacarias
2013-12-04 8:44 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-12-04 10:06 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-12-04 12:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-12-04 12:48 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-12-05 17:49 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-12-05 22:31 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-12-06 1:14 ` Frank Hunleth
2013-12-06 15:58 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-12-09 12:15 ` Frank Hunleth
2013-12-09 12:18 ` [Buildroot] [UNSURE]Re: " François Perrad
2013-12-04 0:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] configs/qemu: update for host-qemu-system goodness Gustavo Zacarias
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131205233131.0cad979d@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox