From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 10:40:43 +0800 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] uclibc: add a missing function member to siginfo.h In-Reply-To: <1389202364-19387-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> References: <1389202364-19387-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> Message-ID: <20140109104043.02d07109@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Vicente Olivert Riera, On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:32:43 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > Applying an upstream patch to add a missing function member on ia64, > mips and sparc arches. > > Upstream patch URL: > http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/libc/sysdeps/linux?id=b4e6e61e2f7c6fb4bf59f66efaa74591a2112912 > > Fixes: > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/fa0/fa03ecc087a4b30df8b0366bb238be3d167a56d9/ > > Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera Siggh. This is again the kind of things that will make package builds work with internal uClibc toolchain, but fail badly with external uClibc toolchains, which are likely to not contain the gazillions of backported uClibc patches that we carry around. I have the feeling that this is a growing problem, and I'm not sure how to handle it. To me, the fact that the uClibc community is completely inactive in terms of releases is really a major issue. A solution would be to not support any uClibc based external toolchain, but that means we would no longer support Blackfin external toolchains for example, which is really not desirable. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com