From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:25:48 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] uclibc: add a missing function member to siginfo.h In-Reply-To: <52CFC72A.3010907@imgtec.com> References: <1389202364-19387-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> <20140109104043.02d07109@skate> <52CE6FE5.9070305@imgtec.com> <20140110153615.34044994@skate> <52CFC72A.3010907@imgtec.com> Message-ID: <20140128222548.1eee4176@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Vicente Olivert Riera, On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:10:50 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > So I understand that your suggestion is to not apply uClibc patches in > Buildroot anymore and just disable the packages (the ones that are > failing) for the affected uClibc versions, and keep them enabled when > the uClibc daily snapshot is selected. Am I right? This would be my preferred solution yes. This way, people would probably realize how broken the uClibc release process is, and would maybe be encouraged to work with upstream. I've added this topic as a discussion item for the upcoming Buildroot Developers meeting. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com