From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:29:12 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] libdrm: bump to version 2.4.51
In-Reply-To: <7298qaxr6i.ln2@ID-313208.user.individual.net>
References: <BLU0-SMTP17825B248554C9C7DA4F813D9B10@phx.gbl>
 <7298qaxr6i.ln2@ID-313208.user.individual.net>
Message-ID: <20140128222912.0f5e0434@skate>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Dear Bernd Kuhls,

On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:45:28 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
> Bernd Kuhls <berndkuhls@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:BLU0-SMTP17825B248554C9C7DA4F813D9B10 at phx.gbl: 
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls
> > <berndkuhls@hotmail.com> ---
> >  package/libdrm/libdrm.mk |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Tested-by: Bernd Kuhls <berndkuhls@hotmail.com>

Sending a Tested-by on your own patch is a bit useless: if you're
sending a patch, we do expect that you tested it. Tested-by, Acked-by
and Reviewed-by tags are useful when provided by other developers on
your patches, or provided by you on patches sent by other developers.

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com