From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:33:54 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] samba: convert to choice package In-Reply-To: <52F87645.8000708@mind.be> References: <1391806354-32698-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <1391806354-32698-4-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <52F87645.8000708@mind.be> Message-ID: <20140210133354.09a2fc57@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Arnout, Gustavo, On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:48:37 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > On 02/07/14 21:52, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > > Convert the classic samba package to a choice and move it to samba3 in > > preparation for the samba4 package. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias > > I don't like this rename. Why not keep the old samba package and add > samba4 to it? If side-by-side installation is not possible, make samba4 > depend on !samba, like is done for qt5. Yes, I would also prefer to keep the Samba package named as it is today, and introduce Samba 4.x as a separate package, without touching the existing Samba 3.x support (except maybe changing the short description, and adding the depends on !samba as suggested by Arnout). Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com