From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mike Zick <minimod@morethan.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 13:56:50 -0600
Subject: [Buildroot] What's the buildroot attitude to u-boot building?
In-Reply-To: <ledfud$cnf$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CAE21AQqMQmKKL0=Q55P2zQhV8+iBdpX416xK+SgZd3+ONi8Mgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <le7p26$n75$1@ger.gmane.org> <20140222000428.77575be9@skate>
 <leb2a2$688$1@ger.gmane.org> <20140223111839.1ef569b9@skate>
 <ledfud$cnf$1@ger.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <20140223135650.074d14a1@core2quad.morethan.org>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:50:53 +0000 (UTC)
Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I've seen a large of number of people/companies who really like the
> > fact that one *single* Buildroot configuration is building their
> > entire embedded Linux system: toolchain, rootfs, kernel and
> > bootloader images.  
> 
> If those make up the entire embedded Linux system, then that would be
> convenient.
>

And there is now the BR_EXTERNAL source tree for the additions to 
complete the specific embedded Linux system.

Mike