From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 12:31:00 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] State of your Qt 5 patches In-Reply-To: <5313095B.7070204@gmx.net> References: <20140302002857.2a9f166d@skate> <5313095B.7070204@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20140302123100.1b966bcd@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Peter K?mmel, On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:35:07 +0100, Peter K?mmel wrote: > > Could you have a look at the following patches, and let me know which > > ones no longer makes sense (because you have sent a new version) and > > which ones still make sense: > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320476/ > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320475/ > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320472/ > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320462/ > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/320407/ > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/317465/ > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/317462/ > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/317461/ > > Hi Thomas, > > the patches where intended for 2014.02. And why wouldn't they be usable now? > Maybe we should simply drop them and wait for Qt 5.3, planned for 29th Apr 2014: > http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5.3-release That doesn't seem like a good idea. April, 29th will be very close to 2014.05-rc1, and so it might be too late to get the changes in. I would really like those Qt 5.2.1 changes to get it now. Can you tell me which patches from the list above still make sense? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com