From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:47:02 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] zeromq: bump to version 4.0.1 In-Reply-To: References: <1381509097-5424-1-git-send-email-jerzy.grzegorek@trzebnica.net> <20140301232520.4ee4b22b@skate> Message-ID: <20140303084702.7790637d@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Lionel Orry, On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:51:45 +0100, Lionel Orry wrote: > > I tried to apply this patch, but unfortunately, it apparently breaks > > the build of mongrel2: > > > > src/superpoll.c: In function 'SuperPoll_poll': > > src/superpoll.c:229:53: error: 'ZMQ_POLL_MSEC' undeclared (first use in this function) > > src/superpoll.c:229:53: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > > > I've checked the other reverse dependencies of zeromq, and they seem to > > build fine. > > > > Can you find a solution to the mongrel2 problem, and resubmit the > > appropriate patch? > > Such a patch would fix compilation, but the fact is this version of What do you mean by "such a patch" ? Maybe you forgot to attach a patch to your e-mail? > Mongrel2 was not tested with ZeroMQ v4 and greater > and I don't know if we can simply bump its version like that. Maybe we > can but I am not 100% sure. > > On another hand, mongrel2 development is becoming active again and > they are trying to prepare a release, so I will try to check there if > they ensure zeromq4 compliance and tested it. I will get back to you > when I can on this subject. Ok, thanks! Does ZeroMQ v4 changes the API/behavior a lot compared to v3 ? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com