From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 12:02:19 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [v2, 5/7] mesa3d: modularize and bump to version 10.0.3 In-Reply-To: <134ouaxlpp.ln2@ID-313208.user.individual.net> References: <5318B183.60005@savoirfairelinux.com> <4homuaxdgh.ln2@ID-313208.user.individual.net> <20140306224559.080a6fb3@skate> <134ouaxlpp.ln2@ID-313208.user.individual.net> Message-ID: <20140307120219.246db8ce@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Bernd Kuhls, On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:03:46 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > yes, but I need several days for testing the several combinations of > Config.in-options. During yesterdays testing some questions came up: > > Is it correct that buildroot lacks llvm support? Indeed, we don't have LLVM support. > If true, I have to remove some radeon-related options Spenser added: > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/x/mesalib.html Probably yes, I am clearly not very knowledgeable about Mesa dependencies. > Also I could not find libclc/OpenCL as buildroot package: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/? > id=a64d3dd1358fe0f69ebbf10da35c9ebd672e6f9d This is only when --enable-opencl is used, no? > The current mesa3d.mk in buildroot only builds the swrast driver, my personal > need is to extend the package to compile the i965 drm driver so I will > concentrate on this. It does not need the dependencies I mentioned above. Yes, that's fine. As long as we make progress by bumping mesa, allow to build it outside of X11, there is no need to support each and every possible combinations from the beginning. The package can be progressively improved. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com