From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] luajit package fails to build on x86_64 for x86
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:21:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140307172121.GC3384@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHkwnC9tLUTAVHnGNyPkPxNFFFMTiqPyAvhtahGEWZAPbY0BgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Fabio, All,
On 2014-03-07 10:59 +0100, Fabio Porcedda spake thusly:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
> > On 2014-03-06 11:43 +0100, Fabio Porcedda spake thusly:
> >> Hi all,
> >> luajit fails to build on a Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 with the following defconfig:
> >>
> >> BR2_x86_generic=y
> >> BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL=y
> >> BR2_PACKAGE_LUAJIT=y
[--SNIP--]
> > And this can not work on a pure 64-bit system (aka, without the 32-bit
> > legacy stuff).
[--SNIP--]
> > Not sure how we can get away with this...
>
> I think we have two choices:
> - add a check to test if 32bit compiler is installed and if not print
> a clear message about the toolchain requirement
I think this would be the first package to add such a check.
How would you propose we implement this:
- in a pre-configure hook (but that will catch the failure late in the
build) ?
- in a make ifeq-block (so we can catch it early in the build) ?
The second solution is more appealing to me, but might be a bit more
complex to implement.
> - add (BR2_i386 && BR2_HOSTARCH='i386') to the config.in to exlude
> such combination.
But that would prevent the combination on systems that are setup with
support for building 32-bit programs, which is a pity...
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-07 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-06 10:43 [Buildroot] luajit package fails to build on x86_64 for x86 Fabio Porcedda
2014-03-06 20:51 ` François Perrad
2014-03-07 10:19 ` Fabio Porcedda
2014-03-06 21:31 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-03-07 9:59 ` Fabio Porcedda
2014-03-07 17:21 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2014-03-07 17:32 ` Fabio Porcedda
2014-03-07 17:49 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-03-07 19:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-03-07 20:37 ` Fabio Porcedda
2014-03-07 20:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-03-07 20:51 ` Fabio Porcedda
2014-03-07 20:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-03-07 21:11 ` Fabio Porcedda
2014-03-07 21:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-03-07 21:58 ` Fabio Porcedda
2014-03-07 22:19 ` Fabio Porcedda
2014-03-07 21:38 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140307172121.GC3384@free.fr \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox