From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 17:24:13 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1 v2] xdriver_xf86-video-intel: Bump version to 2.99.911 In-Reply-To: References: <1396178545-12912-1-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <20140330151109.658eb835@skate> Message-ID: <20140330172413.049cd7d0@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Bernd Kuhls, On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:37:33 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > > Do we want KMS vs. UMS to be a configurable option? > > this is not necessary because the driver can have both options compiled, > therefore I removed the kms/ums-related options. Ok. > > Then in the Config.in file, if BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER_I965 is > > enabled, you want to select MESA3D. > > + select BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D if BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER_I965 > > leads to > > package/mesa3d/Config.in:1:error: recursive dependency detected! > package/mesa3d/Config.in:1: symbol BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D is selected by BR2 > _PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER_I965 > package/mesa3d/Config.in:70: symbol BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER_I965 > depends on BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D Aaah, yes, I was mistaken. If BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_DRI_DRIVER_I965 is enabled, then of course BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D is already enabled. Sorry for the noise. Can you look into the other circular dependency that your patch series has introduced? I've reported it to you yesterday evening. Also, by any chance, are you on IRC ? It would sometimes be useful to be able to discuss things directly with you. Thanks! Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com