From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:04:02 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 03/14] package/x11-video-drivers: do not select, but depends on mesa3d In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20140417230402.253ba4e4@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Yann E. MORIN, On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:04:15 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Currently, X.Org drivers that need mesa3d forcibly select it. [...] > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-ati/Config.in | 5 ++++- > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-glint/Config.in | 5 ++++- > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-intel/Config.in | 8 ++++++-- > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-mach64/Config.in | 3 +++ > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-mga/Config.in | 5 ++++- > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-openchrome/Config.in | 5 ++++- > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-r128/Config.in | 5 ++++- > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-savage/Config.in | 5 ++++- > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-sis/Config.in | 5 ++++- > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-tdfx/Config.in | 5 ++++- > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-vmware/Config.in | 5 ++++- > 11 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) I know the dependency on mesa3d is not something added by your patch, but I'm wondering: do all these drivers actually *require* mesa3d ? Isn't it possible to build for example, the Intel X.org driver, for just 2D acceleration purposes? Or does even 2D acceleration relies on an OpenGL implementation being available, these days? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com