From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 23:56:39 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC/PATCH 1/1] gst-fsl-plugins: fix compile for sysroot based on newer linux kernel headers In-Reply-To: <20140304225057.0d010df6@skate> References: <1393366722-27644-1-git-send-email-ps.report@gmx.net> <1393366722-27644-2-git-send-email-ps.report@gmx.net> <20140302094859.66470cdc@skate> <53161025.7040908@mind.be> <20140304225057.0d010df6@skate> Message-ID: <20140419235639.14dec5f6@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Arnout, On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 22:50:57 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Maybe a generic solution for packages that require specific kernel > > headers is to include a headers_install in the kernel's build? > > But will it work properly? I mean, most of the time, the packages that > need this are vendor-specific packages, that want to access specific > definitions in vendor-specific kernels. And the quality of > vendor-specific kernels is usually quite low, so there are quite some > chances that headers_install might not necessarily do the right thing > as it will not have been properly tested... > > > Anyway, for this one, if it works with -I with all our external > > toolchains and with an internal uClibc and glibc toolchain, then I guess > > it's OK. Perhaps something got fixed in the gst-fsl-plugins bump. > > Is this a Acked-by for the patch? Ping ? :-) Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com