From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Le Bihan Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:56:07 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] smack: new package. In-Reply-To: <20140421121901.743513ef@skate> References: <1398020044-21021-1-git-send-email-eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr> <1398020044-21021-2-git-send-email-eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr> <20140421121901.743513ef@skate> Message-ID: <20140421115606.GA4082@milhouse> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi! On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:19:01PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Eric Le Bihan, > > On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 20:54:03 +0200, Eric Le Bihan wrote: > > > diff --git a/package/smack/Config.in b/package/smack/Config.in > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..971b79a > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/package/smack/Config.in > > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ > > +config BR2_PACKAGE_SMACK > > + bool "smack" > > Dependency on !BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB was missing, due to > usage. Remember to build test your packages with > http://autobuild.buildroot.org/toolchains/configs/free-electrons/bfin-linux-uclibc.config > (to test !MMU) and > http://autobuild.buildroot.org/toolchains/configs/free-electrons/bfin-uclinux.config > (to test !MMU and BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB). Thanks for the polishing! Wouldn't it be useful to add a stanza in the docs/manual/contribute.txt about performing some compliancy tests using these two configurations before submitting new packages? Are there any other criteria that could fit compliancy tests/checklist? Best regards, ELB