Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2014-04-19
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:19:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140422221958.6240077e@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53569BBE.1020707@mind.be>

Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,

On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:41:34 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:

>  I think there should be two changes to the autobuilders.
> 
> - Reduce the % yes. With the growing number of packages, the number of
> selected packages is also becoming unrealistically large.

True. Currently the KCONFIG_PROBABILITY is chosen between 1% and 35%.
Should I reduce that to 30% ? 25% ?

> - If webkit is selected, increase the timeout with an hour. I don't know
> how easy that is, though.

Not easy with the current horrible script, because the timeout is
chosen in a shell script that runs the Python script that actually
generates the configuration and runs the build.

So let's say that I'll reduce the KCONFIG_PROBABILITY on one side, and
increase the timeout for all builds by an hour on the other side. How
does that look?

>  It would of course be even better if the autobuilder would calculate the
> timeout based on historical information from build-time.log, but I guess
> that's a bit too ambitious :-)

Hmmm, sounds fun! But I'd prefer to keep the autobuilder logic smaller
in size than Buildroot itself, if possible :-)

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-22 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-20  6:30 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2014-04-19 Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-20  8:48 ` [Buildroot] Analysis of build " Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-20 13:09   ` Mike Zick
2014-04-21 17:35   ` Luca Ceresoli
2014-04-22 20:25     ` [Buildroot] php / snmp / iconv problem Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-23  1:17       ` Gustavo Zacarias
2014-04-22 16:41   ` [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2014-04-19 Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-04-22 20:19     ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-04-22 22:14       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-04-23  7:22         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-23  8:51           ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-04-23  8:56             ` Jeremy Rosen
2014-04-23  9:02               ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-04-23  9:05               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-23  8:59             ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140422221958.6240077e@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox