From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baruch Siach Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 22:20:08 +0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] protobuf: fix build for some unsupported architectures In-Reply-To: <20140508205627.3b6c61d3@free-electrons.com> References: <9c3886fc2455083ce084000e1741ce4be02675e6.1399552091.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> <20140508205627.3b6c61d3@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20140508192008.GN3861@tarshish> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Thomas, On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:56:27PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > On Thu, 8 May 2014 15:28:11 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > > > @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_PROTOBUF > > bool "protobuf" > > depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP > > depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS > > + depends on BR2_x86_64 || BR2_i386 || BR2_arm || BR2_aarch64 || \ > > + BR2_mipsel || BR2_powerpc > > Unless there's a good reason to not support it, maybe we could keep > BR2_armeb here in the list of supported architectures? I don't see __ARMEB__(?) in the list of protobuf supported architectures at src/google/protobuf/stubs/platform_macros.h, only __ARMEL__. baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -