From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 20:56:27 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] protobuf: fix build for some unsupported architectures In-Reply-To: <9c3886fc2455083ce084000e1741ce4be02675e6.1399552091.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> References: <9c3886fc2455083ce084000e1741ce4be02675e6.1399552091.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> Message-ID: <20140508205627.3b6c61d3@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Baruch Siach, On Thu, 8 May 2014 15:28:11 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_PROTOBUF > bool "protobuf" > depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP > depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS > + depends on BR2_x86_64 || BR2_i386 || BR2_arm || BR2_aarch64 || \ > + BR2_mipsel || BR2_powerpc Unless there's a good reason to not support it, maybe we could keep BR2_armeb here in the list of supported architectures? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com