From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:51:47 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] libunwind: add patch to fix behavior for ARM < v6 In-Reply-To: <20140514204712.GK4096@tarshish> References: <1400017657-12704-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20140514204712.GK4096@tarshish> Message-ID: <20140515095147.202e1f63@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Baruch Siach, On Wed, 14 May 2014 23:47:12 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > > +-# Don't link against libatomic_ops for now. We don't want libunwind > > +-# to depend on libatomic_ops.so. Fortunately, none of the platforms > > +-# we care about so far need libatomic_ops.a (everything is done via > > +-# inline macros). > > +-# > > +-# AC_CHECK_LIB(atomic_ops, main) > > ++ AC_CHECK_LIB(atomic_ops, main) > > For the sake of reproducibility shouldn't we add libatomic_ops to libunwind > dependencies when libatomic_ops is enabled? Yes, you're right! I'll send a patch for that. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com