From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:41:11 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 20/31] xbmc: Allow compilation with uClibc In-Reply-To: References: <1400326806-16428-1-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <1400326806-16428-21-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <20140517161009.56006692@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20140517154111.GB3459@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Bernd, All, On 2014-05-17 17:31 +0200, Bernd Kuhls spake thusly: > Bernd Kuhls wrote in > news:ae9k4bxjmf.ln2 at ID-313208.user.individual.net: > > > Thomas Petazzoni > @public.gmane.org> wrote in > > news:20140517161009.56006692-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8 at public.gman > > e.org: > > > >>> + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 > >> > >> Are you sure RasberryPi and other ARM users are happy with XBMC only > >> being available on x86/x86-64 ? > > > > of course not, but uclibc at arm compilation is broken upstream[1] and > > fixed by the next patch[2] > > thinking about it I squashed the arm patch into the uclibc patch. Exactly what I was gonna suggest. Thanks! :-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'