From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 08:43:11 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2014-05-22 In-Reply-To: <20140528063024.GA3510@free.fr> References: <20140523063008.8A64410106F@stock.ovh.net> <20140523190819.45a80027@free-electrons.com> <53857DE2.6040509@mind.be> <20140528063024.GA3510@free.fr> Message-ID: <20140528084311.05629fce@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Yann E. MORIN, On Wed, 28 May 2014 08:30:24 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > A proper solution would be to adapt our libtool patches to interpret -static as > > -all-static. Or alternatively, to patch the compiler wrapper to interpret > > -all-static as -static (and then of course we'd have to generalize the compiler > > wrapper to also use it for internal toolchains). > > Yes, I think this is a good idea. But we can't use the wrapper to build > the toolchain itself, of course. And there is no wrapper at all when we use the internal toolchain backend. At least as of today. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com