From: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] autoconf caching
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 07:20:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140606052017.GK4197@waldemar-brodkorb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9DZUT8+z0NF5O6sh=y4svCfQW0bh1Zt4r7OM9fe9nYvk-O0w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Dallas Clement wrote,
> Hi All - I have seen posts on this subject before.? It looks like things flamed
> out.
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2012-11/msg00022.html
>
> I'm getting killed by autoconf.? My builds take 1.5 hours even with ccache
> turned on.? Most of the cores in my very impressive build machine are sitting
> on their !#@ while autoconf is running.? Most of my packages rely on autotools
> and it seems that most of the time spent is running configure scripts.
>
> Can anyone offer some advice on how to speed things up with autoconf?? Or is it
> a lost cause?
>
> Many thanks,
There was an interesting discussion about performance on the autoconf
mailinglist:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2014-03/msg00030.html
OpenWrt uses CONFIG_SITE with some global architecture and libc
dependent files, see here:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/include/site
OpenEmbedded uses CONFIG_SITE, too:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/site
They have a lot of package specific values added to their files.
May be the OpenWrt way with just a few global cached values would be
a benefit for buildroot performance?
best regards
Waldemar
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-06 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-05 16:34 [Buildroot] autoconf caching Dallas Clement
2014-06-05 17:05 ` Baruch Siach
2014-06-05 17:34 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-06-05 17:39 ` Dallas Clement
2014-06-05 18:57 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-06-05 20:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-06-05 22:06 ` Dallas Clement
2014-06-06 6:13 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-06-06 7:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-06-06 16:14 ` Dallas Clement
2014-06-06 16:31 ` Mike Zick
2014-06-06 16:45 ` Dallas Clement
2014-06-10 9:32 ` Fabio Porcedda
2014-06-11 17:41 ` Dallas Clement
2014-06-13 9:23 ` Fabio Porcedda
2014-06-14 0:52 ` Dallas Clement
2014-06-14 7:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-06-18 12:37 ` Fabio Porcedda
2014-06-07 9:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-06-08 8:19 ` [Buildroot] [UNSURE]Re: " François Perrad
2014-06-09 20:10 ` Dallas Clement
2014-06-10 7:25 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-06-06 5:20 ` Waldemar Brodkorb [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140606052017.GK4197@waldemar-brodkorb.de \
--to=wbx@openadk.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox